Austro-Asiatic languages - Classification
A group of over 100 languages spoken in SE Asia. Few of them had written forms until recent times, and their connections with other languages in the region are uncertain. The major group is the MonKhmer, which has three main languages: Mon (Tailang), Khmer, and Vietnamese.
| Austro-Asiatic Austroasiatic | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Geographic distribution: |
South and Southeast Asia | |
|
Genetic classification: |
One of the world's major language families | |
| Subdivisions: | Mon-Khmer Munda | |
The Austro-Asiatic languages are a large language family of Southeast Asia, and also scattered throughout India and Bangladesh.
Austro-Asiatic languages have a disjunct distribution across India, Bangladesh and Southeast Asia, separated by regions where other languages are spoken. It is widely believed that the Austro-Asiatic languages are the autochthonous languages of Southeast Asia and the eastern Indian subcontinent, and that the other languages of the region, including the Indo-European, Tai-Kadai, and Sino-Tibetan languages, are the result of later migrations of people. (There are, for example, Austro-Asiatic words in the Tibeto-Burman languages of eastern Nepal.) Some linguists have attempted to prove that Austro-Asiatic languages are related to Austronesian languages, thus forming the Austric superfamily.
Classification
Linguists traditionally recognize two primary divisions of Austro-Asiatic: the Mon-Khmer languages of Southeast Asia, Northeast India and the Nicobar Islands, and the Munda languages of East and Central India and parts of Bangladesh.
Munda North Munda Korku Kherwarian South Munda Kharia-Juang Koraput Munda Mon-Khmer Eastern Mon-Khmer Khmer (Cambodian) Pearic Bahnaric Katuic Vietic (includes Vietnamese) Northern Mon-Khmer Khasi (Meghalaya, India) Palaungic Khmuic Southern Mon-Khmer Mon Aslian (Malaya) Nicobarese (Nicobar Islands)Ilia Peiros (2004)
Peiros is a lexicostatistic classification, based on percentages of shared vocabulary. This means that a language may appear to be more distantly related than it actually is due to language contact, so it is only a starting point for a proper genealogical classification.
User Comments Add a comment…